Universität Wien
LV-Leiter*in:
Ägyptologie, Judaistik, Urgeschichte und Historische Archäologie
LV-Titel:
1.1 At the beginning of the course, the learning outcomes, content and assessment criteria were explained in sufficient detail.
I strongly agree
I strongly disagree
1.2 The lecturer is very motivating.
1.3 I am able to explain the most important content from this course to less advanced students in a comprehensible and clear manner.
1.4 The University of Vienna strives to combat discrimination. If there were situations of any kind of discriminatory behaviour (for example, on the basis of gender, ethnicity, religion or belief, age or sexual orientation) in the course, please describe them here:
1.5 To complete this course, students have an intended workload of X hours (X ECTS credits). In your opinion: Will you invest more or less hours to complete this course?
much more
much less
1.6 Optional: Please specify why you will invest more/less hours than intended:
1.7 Please specify why you will invest less hours than intended:
1.8 Overall, I would rate the course as
very good
very bad
2.1 Degree programme
2.2 In what degree programme are you enrolled?
2.3 What semester are you in?
Questions on the lecturer and the course
2.4 The lecturer appears to be well prepared for the course.
2.5 The lecturer presents the material in an intelligible fashion.
2.6 The course is well structured in terms of content.
2.7 The course content is didactically well-prepared.
2.8 A sufficient amount of time is dedicated to individual parts of the course content.
2.9 Different theoretical and methodological approaches and/or procedures are presented, discussed and/or tried out.
2.10 The course encourages a more in-depth examination of the subject/methodology/procedure.
2.11 The (written) course material was made available online.
yes, all
no, none
2.12 The course material provided (e.g. presentation slides, sources of reference, recommended literature, materials, devices, etc.) allow me to deepen my knowledge of the subject independently.
2.13 I find the requirements posed by the courses to be
too high
too low
2.14 The technical equipment is satisfactory.
2.15 The supervision was appropriate throughout the entire course.
2.16 There were enough phases of interaction and communication. (online or on site)
2.17 For courses held in hybrid or digital form: The students participating online could easily join the discussions.
2.18 I got the chance to sufficiently test practical skills.
2.19 I received sufficient training in the handling of devices and laboratory equipment.
2.20 I learned to adhere to the applicable safety standards.
2.21 How do you assess the external framework conditions (accommodation, food, transportation, equipment, infrastructure, etc.) of the course?
2.22 In comparison with the specifications of the curriculum (ECTS credits), the total workload is
2.23 The courses of this module are well coordinated.
2.24 I have the feeling that the lecturer prepares me properly for the required partial achievements.
2.25 I have a clear idea of what to expect in the required partial achievements.
2.26 The lecturer gives feedback on the students’ contributions, focuses on the students and answers their questions.
2.27 Did you actively request feedback on the individual partial achievements?
2.28 The lecturer gave feedback on individual partial achievements without being asked to do so.
2.29 The feedback from the lecturer on my contributions was constructive and helpful.
2.30 The feedback from the lecturer on my contributions was appreciative.
3.1 Comments on the course and the lecturer:
Licensed to Universität Wien - evasys V8.2 (2291) - Copyright © 2021 evasys GmbH. All rights reserved.
